Some Thoughts on ART by Richard Godwin

Historically debates about art and its cultural significance are thematically cloned by context. They often serve as mouthpieces for politics or trend.

Friedrich Nietzsche posited the theory that it stems from a basis tension between the old Greek gods Apollo and Dionysus, Apollo representing law and Dionysus chaos. In his first seminal work ‘The Birth of Tragedy’ he wrote:

‘…we have considered the Apollonian and its opposite, the Dionysian, as artistic energies which burst forth from nature herself …first in the world of dreams, whose completeness  is not dependent upon the intellectual attitude or the artistic culture of any single being; and then as intoxicated reality…’.

This idea of intoxicated reality runs like an undercurrent through many artists’ theories of creativity. Rimbaud used it for his poetry. Keats wrote of imagination that it was Like Adam’s dream ‘he awoke and found it true’.

I believe that it is hard to create political art. Orwell was arguably the greatest political novelist not least because of his prescience. If you look at the art encouraged by totalitarian regimes you can see a clear illustration of the conflict. Those regimes do not want art. Hitler had no understanding of it, nor the hideously avuncular Joseph Stalin, both sought propaganda machines. The eternal narcissism of authoritarianism is challenged by the self-puncturing of real literature.

During the 1960’s and 1970’s in the US a number of works were performed which transgressed the traditional boundaries of Western genre in the arts.

Jim Morrison urged his fans to ‘ride the snake’. Morrison also spoke of his reading in ‘The Birth of Tragedy’ of the primal Dionysian art as the spirit of music. Morrison moved his performances towards shamanistic theatre. Interestingly Mircea Eliade, author of Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy writes of shamans:

‘they express on the one hand the diametrical opposition of two divine figures sprung from one and the same principle and destined, in many versions, to be reconciled at some illud tempus of eschatology, and on the other, the coincidentia oppositorum in the very nature of the divinity, which shows itself, by turns or even simultaneously, benevolent and terrible, creative and destructive, solar and serpentine.’

Morrison’s ‘The Lizard’ took nearly half an hour to perform in concert and is an act of descent. We’re into the underworld and back to the same divide.

Aristotle based much of his philosophy around a basic opposition and Alfred Korzybski, the Polish semanticist argues in ‘Science and Sanity’ that mental pathology within Western cultures stems from a basic confusion of signifier with signified, in other words thinking that a table is identified with the verbal label we attribute to it. He used to thump the table in his lectures and say ‘this is not a table’. He also saw the basic either/or basis for Western thinking as its primary flaw.

Hegel moved it on in ‘Phenomenology of Sprit’ where he sought a unity stemming from the synthesis resulting from the uniting of his thesis and antithesis, although his may be a variation on the Christian trinity.

Like John Cage, Morrison was drawn to the Lord of Misrule’s carnival. David Bowie said, ‘I know one day a big artist is going to get killed on stage.

Alice Cooper enacted much of the Dionysian on stage, throwing live chickens into the audience, axing dolls to death.

The acid trip, under the influence of Timothy Leary became a religious experience a sign for the Trips Festival read: ‘ANYBODY WHO KNOWS HE IS A GOD GO UP ON STAGE.’ There is a strong sexual element to this, as Euripides’s play ‘The Bacchae’ illustrates, Bacchus being the Roman version of the Greek God. When Dionysus sheds Eros his energy turns negative. He becomes the Devil, as Norman O. Brown shows in ‘Life Against Death’ as the form of excrement, waste and ‘filthy lucre’.

Then something happened at Altamont. After Santana opened a freaked out kid tried to get on stage. The Rolling Stones had hired Hell’s Angels as body guards, they dived into the crowd with five-foot pool cues. While the Rolling Stones waited for darkness the Hell’s Angels taunted the crowd with contempt. Then they parodied the rituals of religious cults. Sol Stern, a former Ramparts magazine editor, wrote: ‘One of them, wearing a wolf’s head, took the microphone and played the flute for us – a screeching, terrible performance; no one dared to protest or shut off the microphone.

Why? Why didn’t they protest? Because they were caught up in group psychology. Why do leaders use it? It’s good for business.

The Mediterranean wolf cults and the flute music of Dionysus, the wild music of the joujouka – the vestigial music of the God which had entranced Brian Jones, Bryan Gysin, William Burroughs, Paul Bowles and Ornette Coleman – had come to this, a preparation for a star.

Into the darkness of Altamont, through the protective circle of the Angels on the blood-spattered stage, came the Stones, led by Mick Jagger in a black and orange cape and tall hat. They played well but their music spoke out the interface between savagery and erotics, between the controls of art and the controls of magic, between Apollo and Dionysus. Jagger began ‘Sympathy for the Devil’ – ‘They call me Lucifer and I’m in need of some restraint’. The earlier Angels’ attacks now climaxed. In the spotlights, when Jagger went on singing this number, they stabbed to death a black youth from Berkeley named Meredith Hunter. Panic-stricken Jagger tried to cool the screaming people, but the death ritual operated as part of his own performance.

The antithesis maybe at the root of art and sexuality.  Cultures create their own paradigms.


Richard Godwin examines these themes in his novels:  

Meaningful Conversations digs deep into it. Below is an extract

Slender Teeth and Slender Minds

My nocturnal research into the aetiology of a butterfly was interrupted by a call from a colleague. I put aside my spectroscope and brushed the bones of yesterday’s dinner from my suede trousers and answered the phone.
The patient has taken over,’ yelled Otto Wall, his voice deranged by silent call girls.
I am an eminent physician of current lunacy and possibly a lycanthrope. My research does involve ants. Politicians send me their private parts to analyse. What time do I have for that? I am the son of the eternal burp. I now recount Otto Wall’s tale of an insurrection in the Dionysian quarters.
OTTO: ‘My patient, a cellist if great standing has turned my entire theory into a cartoon. He believes he is the Candy Man and I will quote to you his recent mutterings.’
Daphne is waiting for me at the end of a long polished corridor in Vacuous Chic, the hotel that houses all the celebrities. They exist without addresses in a cocoon of heartache, seeking stories on the bathroom walls. The language of graffiti hums with resonance, leaking a kaleidoscope of hidden meaning from the Delft tiles and coke-covered mirrors.
Daphne is sinister, dressed in black. She clacks towards me in high heels. I look at her calves, toned and tight beneath her sheer stockings. Her flesh is vacuum packed inside her outfit.
Bertrand, we’re gonna make a great song together.’
I already know the melody,’ I say.
I empty my bladder in the Gents while Daphne waits in the hollow corridor. I look at the decorated tiles. One of them displays an image of Daphne at The Farm. Her lips are the bill of a duck. I do Donald Duck before the mirror, then step outside and watch Daphne waddle to the bar. She sips her cocktail with illegal lips through a straw. She closes them over it, sucking. Bubbles appear on the bell of her glass. They are filled with Disney characters, whose luminous forms dance within their hollow globes. They try to escape from their liquid enclosures, tapping hands on the thin film of liquid. Mickey jostles Goofy, Pluto barks at Minnie. But Donald is not there. He is smelling fresh meat at the bar. He is building Daisy Duck piece by piece.
I watch Daphne drink. I see her throat tighten as she swallows. A mouth like hers belongs strictly beneath the tight silk of a G-string. She dabs it with a napkin and it bulges through the cotton, an erotic pout which I will moisten with the rounded tip of a lipstick. I know what naked colours she likes to wear. She’s lived in my pocket for weeks. Indolent star.
OTTO: Who is Daphne Norman?
Therapy, the endless hole, the sterile orgasm leading to normality, robbed of delirium.
And who wrote that on my bathroom mirror?
I will continue the analysis soon.

2 thoughts on “Some Thoughts on ART by Richard Godwin”

  1. After reading all this I’m dizzy in a good way. Interesting about the tension between Apollo and Dionysus because I recently read a book that said the world is divided into two types of people – Fundamentalists and Artists. The same kind of tension mentioned above. The Book is called The War of Art. He echo’s much of what Richard mentions about the friction. Marry all of these things together and I see us grasping in the dark for bits and pieces of memories we know are there but have yet come to the surface. I think the job of the artist is to get us closer to that elusive past where the truth is. I mean why are we artists the first to noose when it all goes to hell and the fundamentalists (Apollo) take full control. Just throwing that out there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s